New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow intra-Path parallelism #29024
Allow intra-Path parallelism #29024
Conversation
The modules after an EDFilter and before the next EDFilter are allowed to run concurrently. This can be prevented by using cms.wait() on the module in the configuration.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29024/13874
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: FWCore/Framework @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Do you have any comments? @makortel @smuzaffar |
@fwyzard, can you comment if |
IIRC, the design should assume that any number of modules can run at the same time. The only interaction with Paths is through the |
By the way, can different Paths already run in parallel ? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29024/13917
|
Pull request #29024 was updated. @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Are these workflows (11634.0, 12434.0, 20034.0, 20434.0, 21234.0, 23234.0) recent additions to the PR test? @slava77 should these be added to the "matrix map"? (just wondering out loud) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The modules after an EDFilter and before the next EDFilter are allowed to run concurrently. This can be prevented by using cms.wait() on the module in the configuration.
PR validation:
All framework related unit tests pass.