Run3-alca163 Modify the code for IsoTrack analysis to get it adapted for 2017 data

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Special treatment in IsoTrack analysis for 2017 data

PR validation:

Tested by processing 2017 data

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14667

• This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-checks:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14667/code-checks.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14667/code-checks.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-checks to apply code checks directly
• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14667/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14667/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14668

• This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14668/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14668/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29468/14670

• This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos

@cmsbuild, @pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5680/console Started: 2020/04/13 21:48

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 764d514
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2937cc/5680/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-13-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2937cc/5680/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2695166
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 35
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2694812
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[bsunanda]

@pohsun, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @tlampen Can one of you sign this please?

[bsunanda]

@silviodonato, @dpiparo Please try to have it integrated

[silviodonato]

can we merge this alca: ( @pohsun @tlampen @tocheng @christopheralanwest ) ?

[tocheng]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1