New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
re-add also SiPixelPhase1RecHitsAnalyzer to DQM offline for HI scenario #29495
re-add also SiPixelPhase1RecHitsAnalyzer to DQM offline for HI scenario #29495
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29495/14729
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/SiPixelPhase1Config @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@silviodonato and @mmusich, sorry I should have commented before, but I simply forgot. I do not remember why I excluded the residuals plugin form HI, sorry. For the RecHit plugin, I did it, because probably at that time the code was doing exactly the same things done by the TrackCluster plugin, but my memory is not that strong in general :-) |
Indeed the only wf which uses this is 150.0. This is not meant for production but as long as this scenario is supported in release should be monitored. |
+1 |
PR description:
While reviewing the code for PR #29461 I noticed also that some other DQM modules (
SiPixelPhase1RecHitsAnalyzer
) were excluded from being run without apparent reason.I re-add it here, together with the harvester for the residuals.
PR validation:
Standard limited matrix integration tests passed +
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This is not a backport.