Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

re-add also SiPixelPhase1RecHitsAnalyzer to DQM offline for HI scenario #29495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 18, 2020

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Apr 16, 2020

PR description:

While reviewing the code for PR #29461 I noticed also that some other DQM modules (SiPixelPhase1RecHitsAnalyzer) were excluded from being run without apparent reason.
I re-add it here, together with the harvester for the residuals.

PR validation:

Standard limited matrix integration tests passed +

runTheMatrix.py -l 150.0 -t 4 -j 8

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This is not a backport.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29495/14729

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiPixelPhase1Config

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@idebruyn, @threus, @fioriNTU, @hdelanno, @jandrea this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 16, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5729/console Started: 2020/04/16 18:46

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: d7956a5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-300c2b/5729/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-16-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-300c2b/5729/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696435
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2696112
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

Let me add in cc @fioriNTU who added those lines long time ago with #20496.

@fioriNTU
Copy link
Contributor

Let me add in cc @fioriNTU who added those lines long time ago with #20496.

@silviodonato and @mmusich, sorry I should have commented before, but I simply forgot. I do not remember why I excluded the residuals plugin form HI, sorry. For the RecHit plugin, I did it, because probably at that time the code was doing exactly the same things done by the TrackCluster plugin, but my memory is not that strong in general :-)
Anyway, in that PR, I added for the first time the HI processing sequence in PixelPhase1, which was not available yet. So, probably I had some weird crash for the residuals plugin, and I simply decided that was enough without. Then, as far as I remember, for the last HI run we have used the pp configuration, so probablly nobody touched that code anymore because is obsolete in production (but maybe not in Validation). Hope this helps.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 17, 2020

Indeed the only wf which uses this is 150.0. This is not meant for production but as long as this scenario is supported in release should be monitored.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2fa7234 into cms-sw:master Apr 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants