New PCC producer for collecting PCC/lumiblock

[radla118]

PR description:

AlcaPCCIntegrator is added with modified container for collecting the PCC/lumiblock information using PCC/event input. No sequences in the workflow have changed.

PR validation:

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

• verify that the PR is really intended for the chosen branch
• verify that changes follow CMS Naming, Coding, And Style Rules
• verify that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14740

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14740/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14740/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14743

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14743/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14743/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14746

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14746/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14746/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29505/14766

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #29505 was updated. @perrotta, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please check and sign again.

[perrotta]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/5767/console Started: 2020/04/18 15:08

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6654f5d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9772ac/5767/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-04-18-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9772ac/5767/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696435
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2696114
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 319
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[pohsun]

+1

[slava77]

+1

for #29505 6654f5d

• there were no changed in reco category files since the last signoff

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1