rebase of relocateLorentzAngleDB

[hidaspal]

Rebase of relocateSiPixelLorentzAngleDB2CondTools. Replacing pull request #2982. It is the same stuff. It was necessary because of parallel development, relocating some files.

[hidaspal]

It is based on CMSSW_7_1_X_2014-03-25-0200.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @hidaspal for CMSSW_7_1_X.

rebase of relocateLorentzAngleDB

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiPixelLorentzAngle
CondTools/SiPixel

@apfeiffer1, @diguida, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @rcastello, @ggovi, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

-1
I found an error when building:

>> Compiling python modules python
>> Compiling python modules src/CondTools/SiPixel/python
>> Compiling python modules src/CalibTracker/SiPixelLorentzAngle/python
>> All python modules compiled
>> Pluging of all type refreshed.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/ib-integration-CMSSW_7_1_X-slc6_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_1_X_2014-03-25-1400'


you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3022/669/summary.html

[hidaspal]

Sorry for that BuildFile, I did not dare to remove it. It seemed, it caused no harm, only a message. Now removed, no message.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #3022 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @diguida, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @rcastello, @ggovi, @Degano can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3022/678/summary.html

[diguida]

+1

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3022/678/summary.html

[ktf]

@nclopezo: also for this case.

[apfeiffer1]

+1
looks OK from my side

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?