New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DD4hep: SimTracker/TrackerMaterialAnalysis tests #30282
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30282/16224
|
A new Pull Request was created by @vargasa (Andrés Vargas) for master. It involves the following packages: SimTracker/TrackerMaterialAnalysis @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
thanks for this update |
@mtosi No, I guess that won't be done until the migration is completed and old scripts removed working with |
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/TrackingPOGRecoMaterialFromGeometry the point is that this package is currently used, in particular, one of the file you are updating in addition, how could we make the list
? if I would need to adjust the parametrization, is there a way to automatically group material volumes in slightly a different way ? thanks ! |
Please double check, the file you're mentioning
The list shown is filtered from the xml, please see: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/SimTracker/TrackerMaterialAnalysis/python/trackingMaterialAnalyser_ForPhaseII_cfi.py#0015
You probably need to edit the xml files located in |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30282/16280
|
Pull request #30282 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
opsi, thanks ! |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Unify tests in single script, cleanup
PR validation:
(edit) Migration script has been renamed in order to avoid any confusion with legacy scripts