Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add wf 136.72411 re-miniAOD Run2 UL workflow for Run2016B useful for PPS testing #30351

Conversation

slava77
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 commented Jun 24, 2020

the need for this was discussed by email about a month ago.
incidentally, the RECO is still in production https://cms-pdmv.cern.ch/pmp/historical?r=ReReco-Run2016B-JetHT-21Feb2020_ver2_UL2016_HIPM-0032
I tested that this wf runs locally.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30351/16373

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

  • There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

    • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_standard.py modified in PR(s): HCAL only wf #30136
    • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): HCAL only wf #30136

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@chayanit, @cmsbuild, @wajidalikhan, @pgunnell, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Jun 24, 2020

@cmsbuild please test workflow 136.72411

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 24, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: d763696
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-69ca9b/7302/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-23-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-69ca9b/7302/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-69ca9b/136.72411_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+REMINIAOD_data2016UL_HIPM+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016UL_HIPM

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2778811
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2778757
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@chayanit
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants