Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PPS: re-alignment module #30452

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 4, 2020
Merged

Conversation

jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR adds a convenience module which can apply (some) alignment changes directly to lite local tracks, a format that is available in miniAOD. The motivation is to have an effective tool to check alignment updates without the burden of accessing AOD files (often on tape). The alignment updates compatible with this new module are limited to RP shifts - such changes are equivalent to shifts of reconstructed tracks.

This new module will NOT be used in any central workflow, thus absolutely no changes are expected. This new module is intended for private use by experts.

PR validation:

Validation files can be found in "RecoPPS/Local/test/re_alignment". There are several alignment files: full (with complete alignment) and also split into two components (base and corr). Standard PPS reco is made with the "full" (black) and "base" (blue) alignment. Then, the re-alignment is run on top of "base" results with "corr" alignment (red dashed). The plot below shows histograms of reconstructed track positions: As expected black and red-dashed histograms overlap and the blue histogram is misaligned.
make_cmp

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30452/16584

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoPPS/Local

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 29, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 29, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 420c925
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-38c011/7493/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-29-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-38c011/7493/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2778915
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2778864
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30452/16648

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30452/16657

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

  • Found files with invalid states:

    • RecoPPS/Local/plugins/CTPPSLocalTrackLiteReAligner.cc:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

Pull request #30452 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 1, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

+1
Tested at: 3386bdf
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-38c011/7561/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-06-30-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 1, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-38c011/7561/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2784120
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2784069
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • Checked 154 log files, 17 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 3, 2020

+1

for #30452 3386bdf

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review; presently this introduces analysis level code, not affecting the standard workflow
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 3, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ce0e500 into cms-sw:master Jul 4, 2020
@jan-kaspar jan-kaspar deleted the pps_re_alignment_11_1 branch September 21, 2020 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants