Switch to vdt_headers toolfile

[ktf]

In cms-sw/cmsdist#524 we split vdt toolfile in vdt_headers and vdt (i.e. the compatibility library). This moves all the build file to use vdt_headers and introduces a cmsRunVDT which binds libvdt as early as possible (to demonstrate this is actually enough).

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ktf (Giulio Eulisse) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Switch to vdt_headers toolfile

It involves the following packages:

FWCore/Framework
Geometry/CommonTopologies
RecoJets/JetProducers
RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecAlgos
RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelRecHits
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripRecHitConverter
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer
RecoVertex/PrimaryVertexProducer
SimTracker/Common
SimTracker/SiStripDigitizer
TrackingTools/AnalyticalJacobians
TrackingTools/GeomPropagators
TrackingTools/TrajectoryState

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano, @ktf, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @TaiSakuma, @wmtan, @yslai, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @argiro, @nhanvtran, @gpetruc, @cerati, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[ianna]

+1

[ktf]

+1

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #3066 was updated. @civanch, @nclopezo, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @anton-a, @thspeer, @slava77, @Degano can you please check and sign again.

[ktf]

@VinInn

[civanch]

+1

[VinInn]

what is so no obvious in this that requires tons of signature, all pending?

[ktf]

+1
The fact that before it was linking libvdt while now it's not. If @slava77 does not care, I'll just bypass.

[civanch]

+1

[slava77]

jenkins shows differences, e.g. in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_7_1_X_2014-03-31-0200+3066/1895/25.0_TTbar+TTbar+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST+ALCATT/comparisonResults/
I'm suspecting a glitch though .. maybe rerun?

[ktf]

@nclopezo can you run again?

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3066/761/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3066/761/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for 7d335bb
looked at jenkins relmon and with fwlite script using jenkins outputs

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?