Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Clang tidy] Apply checks for reconstruction #30805

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 21, 2020

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Apply new clang checks, redone. Apologies for the inconvenience. See #30508 for more info.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

-code-checks

ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.

RecoBTag/FeatureTools/plugins/DeepFlavourTagInfoProducer.cc:473:1: error: version control conflict marker in file [clang-diagnostic-error]
<<<<<<< HEAD
^
Suppressed 2448 warnings (2439 in non-user code, 8 NOLINT, 1 with check filters).
--
gmake: *** [config/SCRAM/GMake/Makefile.coderules:128: code-checks] Error 2
gmake: *** [There are compilation/build errors. Please see the detail log above.] Error 2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30805/17147

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos
DataFormats/Luminosity
DataFormats/TauReco
EventFilter/HcalRawToDigi
EventFilter/SiPixelRawToDigi
MagneticField/GeomBuilder
RecoBTag/CTagging
RecoBTag/Combined
RecoBTag/FeatureTools
RecoBTag/PerformanceDB
RecoBTag/SecondaryVertex
RecoBTag/SoftLepton
RecoBTau/JetTagComputer
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaIsolationAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaTools
RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification
RecoEgamma/PhotonIdentification
RecoHI/HiJetAlgos
RecoJets/FFTJetAlgorithms
RecoJets/FFTJetProducers
RecoJets/JetAlgorithms
RecoJets/JetProducers
RecoLocalCalo/EcalDeadChannelRecoveryAlgos
RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers
RecoLocalCalo/HcalRecAlgos
RecoLocalMuon/CSCSegment
RecoLocalMuon/DTSegment
RecoLocalMuon/RPCRecHit
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripClusterizer
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripZeroSuppression
RecoLuminosity/LumiProducer
RecoMET/METPUSubtraction
RecoMuon/MuonIdentification
RecoMuon/TrackingTools
RecoPPS/Local
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFSimProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
RecoPixelVertexing/PixelLowPtUtilities
RecoTauTag/RecoTau
RecoTracker/CkfPattern
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors
RecoTracker/MeasurementDet
RecoTracker/TkDetLayers
RecoTracker/TkHitPairs
RecoTracker/TkSeedingLayers
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions
RecoTracker/TransientTrackingRecHit
RecoVertex/GhostTrackFitter
RecoVertex/KalmanVertexFit
RecoVertex/V0Producer
TrackPropagation/SteppingHelixPropagator
TrackingTools/GsfTools
TrackingTools/GsfTracking
TrackingTools/TrackFitters

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @emilbols, @gouskos, @makortel, @yslai, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @hatakeyamak, @robervalwalsh, @rappoccio, @argiro, @echapon, @alesaggio, @jazzitup, @mandrenguyen, @ahinzmann, @abbiendi, @varuns23, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @smoortga, @HuguesBrun, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @pieterdavid, @mtosi, @JanFSchulte, @jhgoh, @lgray, @apsallid, @sobhatta, @cericeci, @hqucms, @ferencek, @dkotlins, @yduhm, @rociovilar, @Sam-Harper, @afiqaize, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @bellan, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @threus, @schoef, @mschrode, @ebrondol, @ptcox, @abdoulline, @dgulhan, @clelange, @Martin-Grunewald, @namapane, @jdolen, @rchatter, @trocino, @riga, @battibass, @gbenelli, @Fedespring, @calderona, @mverzett, @yenjie, @lecriste, @kurtejung, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @yetkinyilmaz, @mmusich, @andrzejnovak, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jul 17, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1
Tested at: f126e9e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21bf2b/8068/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-17-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

mrodozov commented Jul 20, 2020

right, we have to wait for the next IB

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

please test for CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-18-1100

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • release = CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-18-1100

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jul 20, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Test Parameters:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1
Tested at: c5d093b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21bf2b/8143/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-07-18-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21bf2b/8143/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2525996
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2525942
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 47
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 144 log files, 17 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Technical
  • Jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit e277692 into master Jul 21, 2020
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the apply-new-ct-checks-for-reconstruction branch November 6, 2020 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants