Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backporting of the Online ESProducer code for next MWGR #31076

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 12, 2020

Conversation

gennai
Copy link
Contributor

@gennai gennai commented Aug 6, 2020

PR description:

This is a back porting of the code needed to test the ESProducer introduced in 11_2_x for the Run3 online beamspot workflow.

PR validation:

I have checked using the readOnlineBeamSpotFromDB.py under RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/test that I can read the payload created from the past MWGR as well as reading those in the GT after having converted them.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

original PR was: #30965
(already merged)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @gennai (simone gennai) for CMSSW_11_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

CondFormats/DataRecord
RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer

@perrotta, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @tocheng, @VinInn, @ebrondol, @rovere, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 6, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

-1

Tested at: be77349

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18cbba/8613/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: Build

  • Build:

I found compilation error when building:

@@@@ Running edmWriteConfigs for AlcaBeamMonitor
--- Registered EDM Plugin: AlcaBeamMonitor
Entering library rule at src/DQM/BeamMonitor/plugins
>> Compiling edm plugin /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100/src/DQM/BeamMonitor/plugins/BeamSpotProblemMonitor.cc 
In file included from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100/src/DQM/BeamMonitor/plugins/BeamSpotProblemMonitor.cc:17:
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100/poison/RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/interface/BeamSpotOnlineProducer.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
 #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
  ^~~~~
In file included from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100/src/DQM/BeamMonitor/plugins/BeamSpotProblemMonitor.cc:17:
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100/poison/RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/interface/BeamSpotOnlineProducer.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
 #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@gennai
Copy link
Contributor Author

gennai commented Aug 6, 2020

my bad, I will fix it when back from holidays

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

Pull request #31076 was updated. @perrotta, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @jpata, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun can you please check and sign again.

@gennai
Copy link
Contributor Author

gennai commented Aug 6, 2020

This latest commit has reverted the online producers (which should not have touched, I did it by mistake).
Now the file modified are the same as the original PR

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 6, 2020

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

+1
Tested at: 418072f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18cbba/8630/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-08-06-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18cbba/8630/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-18cbba/23234.1001_TTbar_14TeV+RecoFullGlobal_TestOldDigi_2026D49+HARVESTFullGlobal_2026D49

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2780792
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2780740
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/alca-l2 @cms-sw/db-l2 @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 this PR is needed for the next MWGR

@tlampen
Copy link
Contributor

tlampen commented Aug 10, 2020

+1

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Aug 10, 2020

+1

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Aug 12, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 12, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a409b43 into cms-sw:CMSSW_11_1_X Aug 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants