Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed MUON System overlaps for DD4hep Scenario 2021 #31434

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

slomeo
Copy link
Contributor

@slomeo slomeo commented Sep 11, 2020

PR description:

This PR has been triggered by what @vargasa wrote in PR #31182. All the overlaps inside the MUON System have been fixed.

PR validation:

  1. validation by "cmsShow.exe -c overlaps.fwc --sim-geom-file cmsDD4HepGeom.root --tgeo-name=CMS"
    The attached picture shows, after this PR, no Muon overlaps but apparent remaining overlaps in PPS and ZDC.

  2. validation by "nohup cmsRun SimG4Core/PrintGeomInfo/test/python/g4OverlapCheckDD4Hep_cfg.py >& overlaps.out &"

Before this PR the result was: /afs/cern.ch/user/s/slomeo/public/Overlaps/overlaps.out.orig (i.e YB* volumes have some overlaps)

After this PR the result is: /afs/cern.ch/user/s/slomeo/public/Overlaps/overlaps.out (i.e there are not YB* volumes anymore)

  1. validation by runTheMatrix.py -l 25202.1 :

25202.1_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15APVSimu_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25 Step0-PASSED Step1-PASSED Step2-PASSED Step3-PASSED - time date Fri Sep 11 12:27:34 2020-date Fri Sep 11 12:06:10 2020; exit: 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 failed

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

nothing special

overlaps

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@slomeo slomeo mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2020
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31434/18306

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/MuonCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @ptcox, @fabiocos, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slomeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

slomeo commented Sep 11, 2020

@civanch @cvuosalo : please can you allow me to perform "please test" for this PR?

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 11, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Sep 11, 2020

Are 50 cm overlaps real? Is it something new?

@slomeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

slomeo commented Sep 11, 2020

Are 50 cm overlaps real? Is it something new?

No, they are not new. I attached the same picture 10 days ago (i.e. before this PR), please see my post to @bsunanda in the PR #31182. The 50 cm overlaps are not in MUON... I don't know if they are real or not... I hope no

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

bsunanda commented Sep 11, 2020 via email

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 17c34f1

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b28c0/9264/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test2021Geometry had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@slomeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

slomeo commented Sep 11, 2020

I'm reading the log of the failed test, but I don't understand exactly what is the error?

This one: "===== Test "test2021Geometry" ====
cmsExtendedGeometry2021ZeroMaterialXML_cfi.py differs
cmsExtendedGeometry2021ZeroMaterial.xml differs"

or

DD4CMS ERROR +++ Placement FAILED! Parent:CMSE Child:tracker:Tracker Valid:NO ?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@slomeo you have to update all relevant geometries in the geometry script:
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/tree/master/Configuration/Geometry#run-3-geometries

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b28c0/9264/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2620305
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2620276
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Sep 11, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: b0b7e16
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b28c0/9269/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-09-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1b28c0/9269/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2620305
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2620282
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

@slomeo In the PR description, please write that the picture shows, after this PR, no Muon overlaps but apparent remaining overlaps in PPS and ZDC.

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slomeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

slomeo commented Sep 12, 2020

@slomeo In the PR description, please write that the picture shows, after this PR, no Muon overlaps but apparent remaining overlaps in PPS and ZDC.

@cvuosalo : I updated the PR description.

@vargasa
Copy link
Contributor

vargasa commented Sep 12, 2020 via email

@slomeo
Copy link
Contributor Author

slomeo commented Sep 12, 2020

@vargasa : please find below (see [+]) what you requested.

CAVEAT: in this list I added only the name of the volumes where are present overlaps but the number of the overlaps is greater than then the number of the volumes listed here, for example:

Overlap is detected for volume EHAWR_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid) with EHAWR_2:2
and
Overlap is detected for volume EHAWR_2:2 (G4SubtractionSolid) with its mother volume EFAW

(i.e EHAWR_2:2 is cited two times, and so on)

For the complete list please see /afs/cern.ch/user/s/slomeo/public/Overlaps/overlaps.out

[+]
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_2:2 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_3:3 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_4:4 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_5:5 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_6:6 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_7:7 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_8:8 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_9:9 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_10:10 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_11:11 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_12:12 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_13:13 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_14:14 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_15:15 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_16:16 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_17:17 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_18:18 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_19:19 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_20:20 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_21:21 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_22:22 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_23:23 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_24:24 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_25:25 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_26:26 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_27:27 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_28:28 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_29:29 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_30:30 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_31:31 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_32:32 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_33:33 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_34:34 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_35:35 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume ebalgo:ESPM_36:36 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume EHAWR_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume EHAWR_2:2 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume esalgo:SFAbs1PbLinPb_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume esalgo:SFAbs1PbLOutAl_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume esalgo:SFAbs2PbLinPb_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume esalgo:SFAbs2PbLOutAl_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume RP_220_Right_Station_1:1 (G4Tubs)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_1:1 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_2:2 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_3:3 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_4:4 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_5:5 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume BumpBond_6:6 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume Bottom_Wall_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume CTPPS_Diamond_Main_Box_1:1 (G4UnionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume CTPPS_Diamond_Plane_1:1 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume CTPPS_Diamond_Plane_2:2 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume CTPPS_Diamond_Plane_3:3 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume CTPPS_Diamond_Plane_4:4 (G4Box)
Overlap is detected for volume RP_220_Left_Station_1:1 (G4Tubs)
Overlap is detected for volume Bottom_Wall_1:1 (G4SubtractionSolid)
Overlap is detected for volume RP_210_Right_Station_1:1 (G4Tubs)
Overlap is detected for volume RP_210_Left_Station_1:1 (G4Tubs)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Sergio. Can you make a comment with the list of remaining overlaps in CMS from your (g4) logs in the issue please? (To keep it updated) Thanks a lot!

I see you updated #31182 with the overlaps

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 21f43b8 into cms-sw:master Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants