Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca175 Update the macros in view of the issues in HCAL isotrack calibration #32110

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 18, 2020

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Nov 11, 2020

PR description:

Update the macros in view of the issues in HCAL isotrack calibration. Detailed study of the MC file was required to find the real issue in the produced MC files used in the calibration.

PR validation:

Ran the macros on recent summer production of dip ion sample and found issues in the production

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32110/19759

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32110/19760

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32110/19762

  • This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos

@yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: ece737a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-37ade3/10658/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-10-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-37ade3/10658/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529296
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529273
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

kind reminder @cms-sw/alca-l2

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

What are the issues in the HCAL isotrack calibration that you refer to in the introduction to this PR?

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christopheralanwest While trying to get the scale factors, found out that we were not getting isolated tracks with momentum between 40-60 GeV in the endcap region. Investigation of these led to improve CalibTrackProperty code and display the plots. It was resolved that the MC files were produced with the wrong producer.

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 66c0543 into cms-sw:master Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants