New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improving HGCal validation #32124
Improving HGCal validation #32124
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32124/19784
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ebrondol (Erica Brondolin) for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/HGCalValidation @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
--collection all
to produce a list of collection with respective plots, while keeping the single collection option also available--separate
option is enable, each entry in the table will be converted to a link to a webpage which will displayed all plots separately. In order to do this, I have createdSeparateValidation
which is enable in themakeHGCalValidationPlots.py
script.PR validation:
SimpleValidation
is used with the--separate
option.--collection all
and in this other folder using--separate --collection allTiclMultiClusters