Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adjust cp5 cr fragments to compensate P8.240 changes #32319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 30, 2020

Conversation

agrohsje
Copy link

PR description:

P8.240 required changes in the CPx tune fragment. these were already done in this PR:
51db35e#diff-c1a2292179da27b1385f4602a3b7459a8026b7992b84c77241fe3bb284545ee1
but the CR1 and CR2 fragments were not included. Settings now updated to be in sync with the CP5 default.

PR validation:

validation can be found in the talk by Sercan:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/783789/contributions/3364815/attachments/1822138/2980824/2019_Apr2_Pythia8-240_and_PDF.pdf
no available workflow with this special fragment available

@agrohsje
Copy link
Author

assign generators

@agrohsje
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32319/20150

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 27, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @agrohsje for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator

@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 5bd8219

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-27-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c40ea/11120/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c40ea/11120/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c40ea/11120/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
11624.911 step1

runTheMatrix-results/11624.911_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step1_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c40ea/11120/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9c40ea/11120/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@agrohsje
Copy link
Author

Hi @silviodonato, @qliphy. How should I proceed? The segmentation violation is not related to my PR. I just add some P8 specification to fragments that are not even used here.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

please test with #32313

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 28, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #32313

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 5bd8219
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bddad6/11128/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-11-27-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bddad6/11128/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
11624.911 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 34 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@agrohsje
Copy link
Author

Hi @qliphy. Do you mind double-checking, then I sign off?

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

urgent

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Nov 30, 2020

Hi @qliphy. Do you mind double-checking, then I sign off?

@agrohsje They look good to me. Please go ahead. Thanks!

@agrohsje
Copy link
Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Nov 30, 2020

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants