Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca179 Use ESGetToken in the analyzers of Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos #32374

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Dec 2, 2020

PR description:

Use ESGetToken in the analyzers of Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos

PR validation:

Tested using runTheMatrix test workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32374/20220

  • This PR adds an extra 104KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32374/20221

  • This PR adds an extra 108KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos

@cmsbuild, @pohsun, @yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tlampen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32374/20222

  • This PR adds an extra 140KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32374/20223

  • This PR adds an extra 140KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

Pull request #32374 was updated. @cmsbuild, @pohsun, @yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tlampen can you please check and sign again.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Dec 2, 2020

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2020

+1
Tested at: 031859a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d346e/11282/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2020-12-01-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1d346e/11282/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 148 log files, 37 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@yuanchao
Copy link
Contributor

yuanchao commented Dec 3, 2020

+1

  • migrate to esConsumes; message log; code cleaning
  • static checks warnings are part of the modification

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Dec 3, 2020

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants