Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt ChargedHadronPFTrackIsolationProducer for PFTICL candidates (backport to 11_2_X) #32390

Conversation

hatakeyamak
Copy link
Contributor

@hatakeyamak hatakeyamak commented Dec 4, 2020

PR description:

This backport addresses PF to run with recent HGCAL update #31907. More in detail this will allow ChargedHadronPFTrackIsolationProducer to accommodate PF candidates which don't go through the PFBlock mechanism.

PR validation:

For more validation, see the original PR #32202.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

This is a backport of #32202.

@bendavid @rovere @felicepantaleo @hqucms

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @hatakeyamak (Kenichi Hatakeyama) for CMSSW_11_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 4, 2020

backport of #32202

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 4, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2020

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3ea95d/11345/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-12-04-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2020

Comparison results are now available
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3ea95d/11345/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-12-04-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc900

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 37 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 5, 2020

+1

  • Identical backport of Adopt ChargedHadronPFTrackIsolationProducer for PFTICL candidates #32202, identical comments wrt the ones left in the master follow
  • The fix is effective for the charged pfTICL candidates
  • They are all automatically considered as being "isolated": in any case, charged isolation is said not to be relevant for PF candidates from TICL
  • Jenkins tests pass and show no differences in standard workflows (i.e. the ones for which injectTICLintoPF is not specified)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Dec 5, 2020

PS: in order to speed up the approval, I do not add the explicit request of "upgrade" signature here. Kevin already signed the identical PRs in the master and in 11_1_X (#32316), and he was the one that actually requested this backport in 11_"_X (see #32202 (comment))
Off course, feel free to assign also "upgrade" here and wait for @kpedro88 signing it

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit e666c4d into cms-sw:CMSSW_11_2_X Dec 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants