Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EgHLT Phase-II showershape fix : 11_2_X #32470

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 16, 2020

Conversation

Sam-Harper
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR disables the calculation of ECAL showershape variables for superclusters which are not in the ECAL. It sets the showershapes to zero so that by default they pass, this makes things easier to build a trigger as it avoids having to OR the ECAL and HGCAL showershape filters (which likely eventually will be made into a single filter but that is not for today).

No physics changes are expected, the change in behaviour is a crash is prevented for PhaseII

PR validation:

PhaseII E/gamma HLT workflows do not crash.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

#32469: bug fix to run E/gamma HLT Phase-II

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 14, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper (Sam Harper) for CMSSW_11_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers

@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sobhatta, @jainshilpi, @Fedespring, @lgray, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @afiqaize, @varuns23, @cericeci, @ram1123 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented Dec 14, 2020

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #32470 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-591a0b/11730/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-12-15-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2529593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2529570
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 148 log files, 37 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@cms-sw cms-sw deleted a comment from cmsbuild Dec 16, 2020
@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #32469

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7dcace5 into cms-sw:CMSSW_11_2_X Dec 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants