Fix unsafe dqmed analyzers for710pre6

[deguio]

new layer class (thread_unsafe::DQMEDAnalyzer) now available. the classes which use unsafe ES products which have already migrated to the DQMEDAnalyzer interface have been modified to inherit from this new class in order:

• not to loose the work done by the developers
• not to brake the threaded IB

the following pull requests are superseeded by this one:

• thread safe fixes #3158
• Develop dqm 710pre2 v03 #3049
• Exotica Trigger Validation package, modified and shouldn't crash anymore #3178

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @deguio for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Fix unsafe dqmed analyzers for710pre6

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/JetMET
DQMServices/Core
HLTriggerOffline/Common
HLTriggerOffline/Exotica
Validation/RecoEgamma
Validation/RecoTrack
Validation/TrackerDigis
Validation/TrackerHits
Validation/TrackerRecHits
Validation/TrackingMCTruth

@ojeda, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @deguio, @Degano can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @nhanvtran, @cerati, @richard-cms this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

+1
if tests confirm (I have tested a number of WFs in a threaded IB and everything seems to work fine.)

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[Dr15Jones]

thanks

[ktf]

Being tested...

[cmsbuild]

+1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3262/851/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3262/851/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo, @ktf can you please take care of it?