-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update input of nanoULremini wf #32648
Update input of nanoULremini wf #32648
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32648/20703
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
Please test |
thanks |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-572645/12241/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 136.8523 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+upgrade As we switch the input file, so the note on "different files in step1_dasquery.log" can be ignored. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Update the input of nanoULremini wf to use real datasets, not a pilot.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No need of backporting, as it was done in
#32618