New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(11.1.X) Follow-up of #32700 (Phase 2 Muon HLT) #32751
(11.1.X) Follow-up of #32700 (Phase 2 Muon HLT) #32751
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @khaosmos93 (Minseok Oh) for CMSSW_11_1_X. It involves the following packages: HLTrigger/HLTfilters @perrotta, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
+hlt |
backport #32713 |
@@ -311,14 +369,14 @@ void L2MuonSeedGeneratorFromL1TkMu::produce(edm::Event &iEvent, const edm::Event | |||
container.push_back(*tsci); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just in case, in the master branch, there is a range based loop here, https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/32713/files#diff-70b2a719aac32ca979c0ac376047b49c9ed92e9098d0eca81fb05ea80b6ae16dR367-R369
for (auto const &recHit : assoOffseed->recHits()) {
container.push_back(recHit);
}
so the backport and the original PR differ. Let me know if this was intentional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it's intended. The TrajectorySeed class was updated to use edm::Range in 11_3:
877108f#diff-e4ad11aac7f1defe33fb2758bc5ae0ad95b2eb4964cc761285b22266f8e13d67L50
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16e0f2/12563/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Addressing comments in #32699 and #32713
PR validation:
Phase-2 muon workflow
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
#32713