New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove GEM StripDigiSimLinks, only use GEMDigiSimLink #32811
Remove GEM StripDigiSimLinks, only use GEMDigiSimLink #32811
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32811/20996
|
A new Pull Request was created by @watson-ij (Ian J. Watson) for master. It involves the following packages: SimMuon/GEMDigitizer @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth, @civanch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b0e03/12706/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@watson-ij Sounds good. AFAICT GEMStripDigiSimLink is not as useful as GEMDigiSimLink. |
You can probably do the same for ME0DigiProducer (even if it will be phased out in due time) |
+1 |
Yes, thats a good point. I added a commit which also removed the additional SimLink from ME0 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32811/21021
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b0e03/12732/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
…pply the following patch: cms-sw#32811
PR description:
Currently, there are two collections of SimLinks for GEM, GEMStripDigiSimLink and GEMDigiSimLink, which as far as I can see simply duplicate functionality. GEMStripDigiSimLink was only used in the GEMHitAssociator, but is easily replaced by GEMDigiSimLink which is used elsewhere in the codebase.
@jshlee @dildick
PR validation:
Checked the a phase 2 workflow runs to completion with no errors.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: