New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Further preparations of deep tau ID for hlt phase2 (backport to CMSSW_11_2_X) #32832
Further preparations of deep tau ID for hlt phase2 (backport to CMSSW_11_2_X) #32832
Conversation
…that the list of working-points is empty
…olation pT-sum The HGCal work-around is motivated by this presentation: https://indico.cern.ch/event/954050/contributions/4013705/attachments/2103331/3536699/HLTTauTrigger_status_2020Sep16.pdf
- added option to save all input variables to JSON file (this feature allows to compare the input variables in C++ vs python/during the DeepTau training)
…x for accessing the grid of low-level variables
…d" to true in ParameterSet description (true restores the old behaviour of the code)
…147) * Change default values of number of hits variables to not be negative.… … * Use case in getPuppiWeight, remove unnecessary lines and run code checks * Update puppiweights and remove default_value from deeptau v2 related code * Add newline
A new Pull Request was created by @swozniewski for CMSSW_11_2_X. It involves the following packages: RecoTauTag/RecoTau @perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e6ea02/12742/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
I removed the +1 until #32837 is resolved or understood as unrelated |
@@ -1013,11 +1039,19 @@ namespace { | |||
int getPhiTensorIndex(const CellIndex& cellIndex) const { return cellIndex.phi + maxPhiIndex(); } | |||
|
|||
bool tryGetCellIndex(double deltaEta, double deltaPhi, CellIndex& cellIndex) const { | |||
static auto getCellIndex = [](double x, double maxX, double size, int& index) { | |||
static auto getCellIndex = [this](double x, double maxX, double size, int& index) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
static auto getCellIndex = [this](double x, double maxX, double size, int& index) { | |
const auto getCellIndex = [this](double x, double maxX, double size, int& index) { |
to match #32838
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added backport of #32838 and updated PR description accordingly
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e6ea02/12759/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Backports #32676 and #32838 in order to have a consistent setup for phase2 HLT DeepTauID developments from CMSSW_11_1_X on (together with another backport #32831 to 11_1_X).
PR validation:
Automatically cherry-picked commits from original PR. No particular validation done again.