New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
warn when no data is available for CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain unit test #33065
warn when no data is available for CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain unit test #33065
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33065/21375
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages: CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain @malbouis, @yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
Thanks! |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testSSTGainPCL_fromRECO had ERRORS ---> test checkMultiRunHarvestingOutput had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
The error reported is:
@smuzaffar I don't quite understand how this LFN ends up being used in the test.
and the only dataset fulfilling that query that I see at CERN at the moment is: $ dasgoclient -query='dataset dataset=/ZeroBias/Run2*A*SiStripCalMinBias-*/ALCARECO site=T2_CH_CERN'
/ZeroBias/Run2018A-SiStripCalMinBias-12Nov2019_UL2018-v1/ALCARECO while $ dasgoclient -query='site dataset=/ZeroBias/Run2018A-SiStripCalMinBias-PromptReco-v3/ALCARECO'
T1_US_FNAL_Tape
is the DAS version used by the bot different than the one available on lxplus? |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-71ae45/13297/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
fixes #33055
PR description:
As pointed out in #33055 (comment) when the first
cmsRun
instance oftestSSTGainPCL_fromRECO
cmssw/CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain/test/testSSTGain_PCL_FromRECO.sh
Line 4 in 837e8e8
(silently) failed because of lack of suitable input data coming from the dedicate DAS query, the subsequent harvesting step
cmsRun
cmssw/CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain/test/testSSTGain_PCL_FromRECO.sh
Line 6 in 837e8e8
might fail with somewhat confusing errors about a missing (local) file, see #33055 (comment).
By using a python
warning
it should be now clear from the logs that the initial DAS query failed.PR validation:
Run the unit tests in a local check-out area, by using
scramv1 b runtests
- without having set valid GRID credentials (to force the test to fail) and got back:if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport, no backport needed.