New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor ProductResolvers #33230
Refactor ProductResolvers #33230
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33230/21673
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
-Removed put interfaces from base class and use ProductPutterBase abstract class instead -Separated InputProductResolver into DelayedReader* and PutOnRead* variants -BranchDescription::onDemand is also true for case of DelayedReader being used by source -putOrMerge on ProductResolvers was not being used so was removed.
8efc914
to
14f18b0
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33230/21675
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/Provenance @makortel, @smuzaffar, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestGeneratorInterfaceLHEInterfaceFileReading had ERRORS ---> test testGeneratorInterfaceLHEInterface_TP had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
-Added unit test for this case.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33230/21739
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33230/21773
|
Pull request #33230 was updated. @SiewYan, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @mkirsano, @makortel, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please check and sign again. |
please test with #33274 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7753ae/13777/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
1 similar comment
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7753ae/13777/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
no objection to the gen part. |
+1 |
Not sure why the signature doesn't work. Anyway, thanks! |
+1 |
merge |
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
PR validation: