New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
address remaining static analyzer complaints in Validation/RecoTrack and Validation/RecoVertex #33262
address remaining static analyzer complaints in Validation/RecoTrack and Validation/RecoVertex #33262
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33262/21748
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/RecoTrack @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
…and Validation/RecoVertex
7e32cc1
to
84e51f8
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33262/21752
|
Pull request #33262 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dff1fe/13751/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Systematically addressing remaining static analyzer warnings in the following packages:
Validation/RecoTrack
Validation/RecoVertex
PR validation:
It compiles
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport, no backport needed.