New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
All daughter decay filter #33408
All daughter decay filter #33408
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33408/22038
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33408/22039
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ats2008 (Aravind Sugunan) for master. It involves the following packages: GeneratorInterface/GenFilters @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: ClangBuild Clang BuildI found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
See details on the summary page. |
- corrected splelling in header guard
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33408/22049
|
Pull request #33408 was updated. @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-904a3d/14188/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR intends to add new GEN filter to the repo that will select a specific decay based on the decaying particle its daughters and kinematic constraints put on the daughters.This intended as a new module to remove some of the shortcomings that the existing filter has.
The PythiaDauVFilter as implemented here , does not check for the compliance of the cuts for each particle separately. For the specified mother (
ParticleID
) it checks if there are at leastNumberDaughters
daughter particles and exactlyNumberDaughters
daughters that satisfies the specific eta & pt cuts. ( the gamma multiplicity of Bs->Mu Mu Gamma decay in the validation section)For detailed context on the issue please see the slides from the BPH Trigger meeting here( tldr : see slides 6,7,8 )
PR validation:
The validation was done by using the deacy Bs->Mu+ Mu- Gamma, using PythiaDauVFilter and the PythiaAllDauVFilter
With PythiaDauVFilter filter
For PythiaAllDauVFilter filter