New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MTV fast cleaning #33500
MTV fast cleaning #33500
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33500/22234
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33500/22239
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for master. It involves the following packages: Validation/RecoTrack @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13f6e8/14426/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Thanks for this PR @mtosi !! |
ping @mtosi |
kind reminder @mtosi |
apologies for the delay, there was a "feature" (aka bug), indeed it should be fixed, now |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33500/22472
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33500/22474
|
Pull request #33500 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13f6e8/14950/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
I see that this PR, for example in
Many of the removed plots were not empty. @mtosi could you confirm that these changes are expected? Thanks |
I read "a new flag has been added in order to make the dzcut related performance plots on-demand" and understand they are now off by default. |
+1 |
PR description:
the Multi Track Validator (MTV) is one of the main computational and memory offenders in the VALIDATION step.
there are some not that necessary plots, and with this PR they are removed
and a new flag has been added in order to make the dzcut related performance plots on-demand