Validation/RecoEgamma remove recomp histos from miniAOD Validation

[archiron]

PR description:

Removing of unused recomp plots in miniAOD EGamma Validation (Validation/RecoEgamma/plugins/ElectronMcMiniAODSignalValidator.cc/h). Those histograms are comparing the PF-isolation computed at the RECO-level and that re-computed on-the-fly from the PF candidates (this comparison is done with a different plotting tool, not in DQM).
These histograms were not much useful and we drop them.

PR validation:

compilation is OK, basics tests (scram b runtests or local tests) are OK too.
runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos tests are fine (38 37 36 27 17 4 1 1 1 tests passed, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 failed).
here is the run-log :
runall-report-step123-.log

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

• verify that the PR is really intended for the chosen branch -> OK.
• verify that changes follow CMS Naming, Coding, And Style Rules -> OK.
• verify that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions -> OK.

@beaudett

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33575/22373

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33575/22373/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33575/22373/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33575/22374

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @archiron (Chiron) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/RecoEgamma

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[jfernan2]

please test

[jfernan2]

This PR tries to solve issue #33554
Thanks @archiron

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ecaaa5/14703/summary.html
COMMIT: 9c58831
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-04-29-0800/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/33575/14703/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2877548
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2877513
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -27.208 KiB( 37 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): -1.432 KiB EgammaV/ElectronMcSignalValidatorMiniAOD
• Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[jfernan2]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[silviodonato]

+1