New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGCAL] SimTracksters from Caloparticles #33638
[HGCAL] SimTracksters from Caloparticles #33638
Conversation
@cmsbuild please test |
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ namespace ticl { | |||
// The vertices of the DAG are the indices of the | |||
// 2d objects in the global collection | |||
std::vector<unsigned int> vertices_; | |||
std::vector<uint8_t> vertex_multiplicity_; | |||
std::vector<float> vertex_multiplicity_; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious if the schema evolution handles this appropriately.
@felicepantaleo please clarify/confirm that tracksters from the old files are still correctly readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could run the trackster validation on old files with this branch.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33638/22508
|
A new Pull Request was created by @felicepantaleo (Felice Pantaleo) for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/HGCalReco @perrotta, @jpata, @srimanob, @kpedro88, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
@felicepantaleo you need to propagate the premixing modification to the new
|
@cmsbuild please test |
@cmsbuild please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33638/22520
|
ok, I think I am done with it... |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-81c9a3/14908/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
Is this something you expect? |
@srimanob yes, definitely |
+Upgrade This PR is expected to improve SimTracksters. Changes have been seen, and they are expected as confirmed by HGCAL. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR improves SimTracksters by:
PR validation:
validated using
23293.0