Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix circular dependency between RecoEgamma and RecoEcal #33653

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 12, 2021

Conversation

swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is a purely technical PR and no change in physics is expected. It was pointed out by @davidlange6 in this comment that in my past PR (#33148) I had introduced a circular dependency between RecoEgamma and RecoEcal. I'm fixing that in this PR.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py limited test with 23234.0 and 136.793

This PR is not a backport.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 6, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33653/22539

  • This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 6, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sscruz, @Sam-Harper, @lecriste, @rchatter, @jainshilpi, @sobhatta, @rovere, @lgray, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @Fedespring, @thomreis, @afiqaize, @simonepigazzini, @argiro, @varuns23, @cericeci, @ram1123 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 6, 2021

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 7, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ea199/14925/summary.html
COMMIT: 05ae7d1
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-06-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/33653/14925/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

CMS Clang-Tidy warnings: There are Clang-Tidy warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6ea199/14925/llvm-analysis/cmsclangtidy.txt for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2662646
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2662617
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • Checked 155 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 11, 2021

+reconstruction

for #33653 05ae7d1

  • this is a technical update, as described in the title and the PR description

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented May 12, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 552319d into cms-sw:master May 12, 2021
afiqaize added a commit to afiqaize/cmssw that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
afiqaize added a commit to afiqaize/cmssw that referenced this pull request May 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants