New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix issue with watching Runs and LuminosityBlocks in Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers [11.3.X] #33867
fix issue with watching Runs and LuminosityBlocks in Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers [11.3.X] #33867
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_11_3_X. It involves the following packages: Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type bug-fix |
urgent |
@cmsbuild, please test |
I tested this PR with the tarball from Tier0: For reference here are the commands I used:
|
@mmusich title says |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0da234/15358/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
usual gazillion unrelated differences from the DD4HEP workflow |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport or #33866
PR description:
In PR #32432 the classes
AlcaBeamSpotHarvester
andPCLMetadataWriter
have been migrated from legacyEDAnalyzer
s toedm::one::EDAnalyzer
, though not correctly as they need to observe bothRun
andLuminosityBlock
transitions in order to supportbeginRun|LuminosityBlock
andendRun|LuminosityBlock
methods that are doing actual work. This has resulted e.g. in the problem reported in this Tier-0 Hypernew thread.This PR fixes the issue.
PR validation:
It compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This is a backport of PR #33866, needed to support upcoming MWGRs