New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge .h with .cc files in RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers #33935
Merge .h with .cc files in RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers #33935
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33935/23012
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers @perrotta, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @slava77, @jpata, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-313131/15520/summary.html CMS Clang-Tidy warnings: There are Clang-Tidy warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-313131/15520/llvm-analysis/cmsclangtidy.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was renaming RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers/interface/EcalBasicClusterLocalContCorrection.h -> RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers/src/EcalBasicClusterLocalContCorrection.h
intentional? Shouldn't it become .cc?
Yes, that was intentional. |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Part of the series of PRs that merges
.h
files with the.cc
files of the plugins in the RecoEcal subsystem.This has already been done for the RecoEgamma subsystem (see e.g. #32438, #32613, #32362, #32266, #32259).
It makes maintaining the plugins much easier and also excludes the possibility to wrongly include plugin header files (as happened in Validation/EcalClusters and fixed in the second commit of this PR).
PR validation:
CMSSW compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport intended.