New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split dqm configuration tests in smaller parts to avoid timeouts #34306
Conversation
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34306/23638
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/Configuration @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-057b03/16396/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Thanks @smuzaffar ! |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
For ppc64le and aarch64 archs, DQM offline configuration tests timed out [a] after
1 hour
, see the discussion [b].This PR proposes to split the DQM offline configuration tests in smaller parts (
10
configurations per test instead of20
). This should allow to finish each test with in1h
( the time limit we set for IBs and PR tests)[a]
[b]