New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reserve one bit for the flag in pixel digi packing - bugfix for PR #34509 #34662
Conversation
type bug-fix |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34662/24273
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tsusa (Tatjana Susa) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
urgent |
Hi @civanch as discussed today at ORP can you please sign this quickly so it can still be included in pre5? Thanks! |
@cmsbuild please test |
( I forgot during the ORP that this fix is not in the reco category; well, one signature less) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d96896/17274/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
@tsusa can the title be a little bit more specific? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is a follow up (bugfix) of the PR #34509, which was intended to reserve one bit for flagging individual pixels, but failed to do so.
No changes are expected.
PR validation:
No failure when running runTheMatrix.py
@veszpv, @mmusich, @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2