Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RecoParticleFlow] Cleanup for unused/private header #34745

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 5, 2021
Merged

[RecoParticleFlow] Cleanup for unused/private header #34745

merged 1 commit into from Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

As reported in #34718 , this is cleanup of private header usage. Thsi should fix the private issue

1 src/PhysicsTools/RecoAlgos/plugins/KalmanVertexFitter.h

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34745/24405

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking (reconstruction)

@perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @cbernet, @rovere, @lgray, @lecriste, @hatakeyamak, @ebrondol, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 3, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7d246c/17479/summary.html
COMMIT: aa1b0ea
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-03-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34745/17479/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 11630.011630.0_QCD_Pt_3000_3500_14TeV+2021+QCD_Pt_3000_3500_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step2_QCD_Pt_3000_3500_14TeV+2021+QCD_Pt_3000_3500_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log
  • 11601.011601.0_SingleElectronPt10+2021+SingleElectronPt10_pythia8_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step2_SingleElectronPt10+2021+SingleElectronPt10_pythia8_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log
  • 11602.011602.0_SingleElectronPt35+2021+SingleElectronPt35_pythia8_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step2_SingleElectronPt35+2021+SingleElectronPt35_pythia8_GenSimINPUT+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2998564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2998535
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 4, 2021

+reconstruction

for #34745 aa1b0ea

  • code changes are technical; switching to use the general header RecoVertex/KalmanVertexFit/interface/KalmanVertexFitter.h instead of an indirect and also private PhysicsTools/RecoAlgos/plugins/KalmanVertexFitter.h
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no (relevant) differences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Aug 5, 2021

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Aug 5, 2021

merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants