New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation plots for APE and bug fixes #34828
Conversation
@cmsbuild, ping? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34828/24608
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mteroerd (Marius Teroerde) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d2cfd3/17672/summary.html There was an issue with git-cms-merge-topic you can see the log here: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d2cfd3/17672/git-merge-result |
@smuzaffar how do I interpret the bizarre merge error above? |
This is due to github service issue. Thing are getting back to normal now. I would suggest to restart the test |
please test |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d2cfd3/17683/summary.html There was an issue with git-cms-merge-topic you can see the log here: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d2cfd3/17683/git-merge-result |
41a504d
to
eb9c7bd
Compare
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d2cfd3/17753/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
@mteroerd We may also need a backport to 12_0_X? |
Validation plots for APE and bug fixes: Backport of #34828
Validation plots for APE and bug fixes: Backport of #34828
PR description:
Changes to the APE tool:
PR validation:
Ran some basic tests of the code on the most recent APE campaign to confirm that the changes work as intended.