Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ECAL esConsumes migration of Calibration packages #35107

Merged

Conversation

thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

@thomreis thomreis commented Sep 1, 2021

PR description:

This PR migrates ECAL related code in the Calibration packages to esConsumes (#31061). In addition getByLabel() calls were replaced by getByToken() and legacy module types were migrated to multithreaded module types.

PR validation:

Code compiles.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35107/24998

  • This PR adds an extra 212KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 1, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/EcalAlCaRecoProducers (alca)
  • Calibration/EcalCalibAlgos (alca)

@yuanchao, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @tocheng, @argiro, @thomreis, @simonepigazzini, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Comment on lines 77 to 78
//! eta size of the additive border to the sub-matrix
// int m_etaBorder ; //FIXME
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this commented out code expected to be used?

Comment on lines 81 to 82
//! phi size of the additive border to the sub-matrix
// int m_phiBorderEB //FIXME;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this commented out code expected to be used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not know. I just did the esConsumes migration and I do not use this code otherwise.

//! eta size of the regions
int m_etaWidth;
const int m_etaWidth;
// std::map<int,float> m_eta;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this commented out code expected to be used?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 2, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35107/25028

  • This PR adds an extra 224KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2021

Pull request #35107 was updated. @yuanchao, @malbouis, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a2f821/18254/summary.html
COMMIT: 7a77d78
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-02-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35107/18254/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 136.72413136.72413_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met+HARVESTDR2_REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met/step2_RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+RunJetHT2016B_reminiaodUL+REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met+HARVESTDR2_REMININANO_data2016UL_HIPM_met.log

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000376
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

thomreis commented Sep 2, 2021

Does not look like an error that is related to this PR.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 2, 2021

Does not look like an error that is related to this PR.

Yes indeed, I'll re-trigger tests later

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 2, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 3, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a2f821/18271/summary.html
COMMIT: 7a77d78
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-02-1600/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35107/18271/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000382
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 3, 2021

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 3, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Sep 3, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 27edb97 into cms-sw:master Sep 3, 2021
@thomreis thomreis deleted the ecal-esconsumes-migration-calibration-pkg branch September 7, 2021 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants