New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added esConsumes calls to code in RecoLocalMuon #35184
Conversation
Also used esConsumes in DTRecSegment2DExtendedProducer.cc
also applied formatting
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35184/25121
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @andrius-k, @yuanchao, @rekovic, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @rvenditti, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @cecilecaillol, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
FYI @swagata87 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove commented out code + get rid of std::cout
@@ -88,5 +90,6 @@ class DTTTrigCalibration : public edm::EDAnalyzer { | |||
std::unique_ptr<DTTimeBoxFitter> theFitter; | |||
// The module for t0 subtraction | |||
std::unique_ptr<DTTTrigBaseSync> theSync; //FIXME: should be const |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe time to make it const
as the comment suggests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neither std::unique_ptr<DTTTrigBaseSync const> theSync;
nor const std::unique_ptr<DTTTrigBaseSync> theSync;
compile. So it is unclear what that legacy comment wants.
Hi @tvami , thanks! |
ping @cms-sw/l1-l2 |
+reconstruction
|
+Upgrade For the upgrade part, the change is in |
@rekovic @cecilecaillol @lathomas would you please sign this? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Code compiles.