New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
check CMS_OPENLOOPS_PREFIX env variable before using it #35425
Conversation
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ | |||
" METS_BBAR_MODE 5;", | |||
" NJET:=2; LJET:=2; QCUT:=20.;", | |||
" ME_SIGNAL_GENERATOR Comix Amegic LOOPGEN;", | |||
" OL_PREFIX={0} ".format(os.environ['CMS_OPENLOOPS_PREFIX']), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cms-sw/generators-l2 , aren't we missing a ;
here? Should not it be
" OL_PREFIX={0};".format(....)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @smuzaffar , thanks for catching it. Could you please add the ;? Thanks!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35425/25550
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages:
@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c988d9/18947/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@agrohsje did you notice the question from @smuzaffar? And what is the answer? |
Hello @perrotta , yes , the semi-colon is missing. But its look like it pass the test without ;. For consistency, one should add ; |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35425/25580
|
Pull request #35425 was updated. @SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please check and sign again. |
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c988d9/19171/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Workflow
573.0
forppc64le
IBs fails with errorthis is because for
ppc64le
openloops
is not build and envCMS_OPENLOOPS_PREFIX
is not available.The PR checks the variable before using it. Workflow
573
is still going to fail with erroras the library
libProc_P2_2.so
( bundled in gridpacks) is built forx86_64
and not going to work onppc64le and aarch64