[10_2_X] Backport of O2O test setup modified to work across boost version changes

[tvami]

PR description:

See description at #35440 and #35472

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

backport of #35440 and #35472

resolves #28812

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for CMSSW_10_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

• CondCore/Utilities (db)
• CondTools/Ecal (db)

@ggovi, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rchatter, @simonepigazzini, @mmusich, @thomreis, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Fix for O2O tests requiring to read runinfo payload #35472

[tvami]

type bug-fix

[tvami]

backport of #35440

[tvami]

backport of #35472

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please abort

[tvami]

code-checks

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35517/25724

• This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b3f1c/19349/summary.html
COMMIT: 11a6c05
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_2_X_2021-10-03-0000/slc6_amd64_gcc700
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35517/19349/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test EcalTPGPhysicsConst_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainTowerEE_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGWeightIdMap_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainEBGroup_O2O_test had ERRORS
and more ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3007546
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3007353
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
• Checked 129 log files, 28 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #35517 was updated. @ggovi, @malbouis, @cmsbuild, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b3f1c/19350/summary.html
COMMIT: c56d148
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_2_X_2021-10-03-0000/slc6_amd64_gcc700
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35517/19350/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3007546
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3007354
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
• Checked 129 log files, 28 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

Unit tests pass now:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b3f1c/19350/unitTests/success.html

Is there anything else to be done here @ggovi ?

[ggovi]

@tvami That's just it, thanks!

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1
Duplicate Dictionaries Warning already in IB