Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removal of the unused class of SiPixelCPEGenericDBErrorParametrization #35545

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Oct 9, 2021

Conversation

tvami
Copy link
Contributor

@tvami tvami commented Oct 5, 2021

PR description:

Removal of the unused class of SiPixelCPEGenericDBErrorParametrization. It's been taken over by the PixelCPEGeneric algorithm years ago (about 2008). Please note that the corresponding tag from the GTs have been removed in the past already, this is just the code cleaning part of it.

Edit:

  • SiPixelDBTest_cfg.py is removed, an improved version of this can be found under CondTools/SiPixel

PR validation:

Tested with

runTheMatrix.py -l 11634.0 -j 8

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport and no backport is needed

resolves cms-AlCaDB/AlCaTools#33

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35545/25774

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers (alca)
  • RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelRecHits (reconstruction)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @tocheng, @VinInn, @OzAmram, @ferencek, @dkotlins, @rovere, @gpetruc, @mmusich, @threus, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 5, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20dea2/19420/summary.html
COMMIT: 22f01b9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-05-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35545/19420/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3219394
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3219366
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@ferencek
Copy link
Contributor

ferencek commented Oct 5, 2021

Thanks, @tvami, for going ahead with the cleanup. What about the related CondFormat SiPixelCPEGenericErrorParm (https://cmssdt.cern.ch/dxr/CMSSW/search?q=SiPixelCPEGenericErrorParm&case=true)? I guess that one is also no longer actively used and can be removed.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 5, 2021

Hi @ferencek I removed some of what you are referring to. However there is an AlCa policy not to remove the record definition and registration. I'm not sure what to do with a record that has really never been used in production, we'll discuss this inside AlCa and I'll come back to this tomorrow

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35545/25780

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2021

Pull request #35545 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 6, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

Remove SiPixelFakeCPEGenericErrorParmESSource_cfi.py
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 6, 2021

@ferencek the files under CondFormats/SiPixelObjects and CondFormats/DataRecord/ need to be kept due to the CMS policy about the records in the database. If you prefer I can remove them from ESProducer. Otherwise, I'd keep the PR as it is. Please let me know.

Looking at https://cmssdt.cern.ch/dxr/CMSSW/search?q=SiPixelFakeCPEGenericErrorParmESSource&case=true it looks like the SiPixelFakeCPEGenericErrorParmESSource .h, .cc, and cfi files can be removed.

Done

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35545/25803

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2021

Pull request #35545 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 6, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20dea2/19449/summary.html
COMMIT: 8fe467e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-06-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35545/19449/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3219394
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3219372
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 7, 2021

Jenkins test pass nicely, no diff found, the SA only has a single warning for the bricked design

@malbouis
Copy link
Contributor

malbouis commented Oct 7, 2021

+alca

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 9, 2021

+reconstruction

for #35545 8fe467e

  • code changes in reco are technical, following up the removal in CalibTracker; also, SiPixelDBTest_cfg.py is removed which seems to be OK (although some note about it would be nice in the PR description)
  • jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 9, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6dd1b7b into cms-sw:master Oct 9, 2021
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvami commented Oct 9, 2021

(although some note about it would be nice in the PR description)

I updated the PR description now @slava77

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecated EDAnalyzer & esGet in CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers
7 participants