Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for UBSAN DQM crash #35658

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 18, 2021
Merged

Fix for UBSAN DQM crash #35658

merged 2 commits into from Oct 18, 2021

Conversation

jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

As pointed out in:
#35605 (comment)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35658/25928

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test workflow 1003.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19605/summary.html
COMMIT: 98b577c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-13-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35658/19605/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19605/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19605/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2796107
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2796053
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -1224.715 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10024.0,... ): -96.688 KiB L1TEMU/L1TdeCSCTPG
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 136.731 ): -64.459 KiB L1TEMU/L1TdeCSCTPG
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 14, 2021

Wondering if we should just use @allForPrompt which is updated in #35605, instead of this customization? The difference seems to be only egamma, I guess it can run anyways. So we don't need to customize in several places in future.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

I fully agree @srimanob
Thanks for the suggestion!

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test workflow 1003.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35658 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Should we abort and start the test again?

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

abort

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflow = 1003.0

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19681/summary.html
COMMIT: d8d5b23
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-15-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35658/19681/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2751113
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2751085
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 170 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

Updating DQM and Harvesting sequence of problematic data workflow to allForPrompt. Test runs fine on problematic workflow.

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 18, 2021

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 Any comment?

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 18, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants