New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries #35779
Fix the GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries #35779
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26137
|
A new Pull Request was created by @dildick (Sven Dildick) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @cecilecaillol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-813a0b/19950/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Results make no sense, because Phase-2 scenarios are not analyzing the GE2/1 clusters. See these lines: // ignore 16-partition GE2/1 pads
if (gemid.isGE21() and digi->nPartitions() == GEMPadDigiCluster::GE21SplitStrip)
continue; Clusters from 16-partition geometries are the default for Phase-2. So this validation module needs to be updated before we can see the effect from fixing the GE2/1 clusters. |
Rather than ignoring them, the validation code should be update so that it can handle 8-partition GE2/1 clusters and 16-partition GE2/1 clusters. FYI @jshlee |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26235
|
Pull request #35779 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @cecilecaillol, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@jshlee @yeckang // ignore 16-partition GE2/1 pads
if (gemid.isGE21() and digi->nPartitions() == GEMPadDigiCluster::GE21SplitStrip)
continue; But |
@jfernan2 Can you restart the tests? To check if the GE2/1 cluster plots are now filled for 16 partition geometries? Thanks! |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26766
|
Pull request #35779 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @cecilecaillol, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-813a0b/20664/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@dildick as usual, I don't have the expertise to judge if the changes introduced are expected so, if you could give green light to them it is apreciated: Specially because there differences in CSC beyond the changes introduced in GEM code |
The plots look good. There are differences only for WFs which have a muon geometry >= M8 (https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/Geometry/README.md). The Phase-2 WFs with the older M4 geometry do not change. That makes sense, because the pad producer was not broken for M4. For >=M8 the pad producer and pad cluster producer are now working. In the CSC L1T producer, GEM-CSC integrated local triggers are being produced in ME2/1 OTMBs. The CSC DQM is responding to the OTMBs with GEM-CSC LCTs. |
+1 |
Thanks |
@rekovic Can you sign off, please? |
@rekovic Can you sign, please? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
PR description:
The GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries was not correctly working.
PR validation:
Tested with D80 geometry on file
/store/relval/CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4/RelValTenMuExtendedE_0_200/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW/121X_mcRun4_realistic_v5_2026D80noPU-v1/2580000/0021ccff-2964-4ee4-9ad3-c0c81bb0fb83.root
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A