Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries #35779

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Nov 30, 2021
Merged

Fix the GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries #35779

merged 5 commits into from Nov 30, 2021

Conversation

dildick
Copy link
Contributor

@dildick dildick commented Oct 22, 2021

PR description:

The GE2/1 pad producer for 16-partition geometries was not correctly working.

PR validation:

Tested with D80 geometry on file /store/relval/CMSSW_12_1_0_pre4/RelValTenMuExtendedE_0_200/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW/121X_mcRun4_realistic_v5_2026D80noPU-v1/2580000/0021ccff-2964-4ee4-9ad3-c0c81bb0fb83.root

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

N/A

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26137

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @dildick (Sven Dildick) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/L1TGEM (l1)

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @cecilecaillol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Oct 26, 2021

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-813a0b/19950/summary.html
COMMIT: da63a45
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-25-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35779/19950/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 41
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2797338
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2797267
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 40 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 173 log files, 37 edm output root files, 41 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 26, 2021

Results make no sense, because Phase-2 scenarios are not analyzing the GE2/1 clusters. See these lines:

https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Validation/MuonGEMDigis/plugins/GEMPadDigiClusterValidation.cc#L204-L206

      // ignore 16-partition GE2/1 pads
      if (gemid.isGE21() and digi->nPartitions() == GEMPadDigiCluster::GE21SplitStrip)
        continue;

Clusters from 16-partition geometries are the default for Phase-2. So this validation module needs to be updated before we can see the effect from fixing the GE2/1 clusters.

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 26, 2021

Rather than ignoring them, the validation code should be update so that it can handle 8-partition GE2/1 clusters and 16-partition GE2/1 clusters.

Screen Shot 2021-10-26 at 3 18 09 PM

FYI @jshlee

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26235

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35779 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @cecilecaillol, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 26, 2021

@jshlee @yeckang GEMPadDigiValidation and GEMPadDigiClusterValidation should be flexible enough to handle both 8 and 16 partition GE2/1 geometries right? In which case I can simply delete

      // ignore 16-partition GE2/1 pads
      if (gemid.isGE21() and digi->nPartitions() == GEMPadDigiCluster::GE21SplitStrip)
        continue;

But GEMDigiMatcher needs an update so it can distinguish between the 8 and 16 partition GE2/1 geometry.

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 28, 2021

@jfernan2 Can you restart the tests? To check if the GE2/1 cluster plots are now filled for 16 partition geometries? Thanks!

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35779/26766

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35779 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @cecilecaillol, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-813a0b/20664/summary.html
COMMIT: e4fc61b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-21-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35779/20664/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3247021
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 119
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 210
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3246670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.778 KiB( 41 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -0.016 KiB GEM/Pad
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -0.016 KiB GEM/PadCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): -0.031 KiB GEM/Pad
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): -0.031 KiB GEM/PadCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 35034.0,... ): -0.078 KiB GEM/Pad
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 35034.0,... ): -0.078 KiB GEM/PadCluster
  • Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

@dildick as usual, I don't have the expertise to judge if the changes introduced are expected so, if you could give green light to them it is apreciated:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-21-2300+813a0b/46968/dqm-histo-comparison-summary.html

Specially because there differences in CSC beyond the changes introduced in GEM code

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 23, 2021

The plots look good. There are differences only for WFs which have a muon geometry >= M8 (https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/Geometry/README.md). The Phase-2 WFs with the older M4 geometry do not change. That makes sense, because the pad producer was not broken for M4. For >=M8 the pad producer and pad cluster producer are now working. In the CSC L1T producer, GEM-CSC integrated local triggers are being produced in ME2/1 OTMBs. The CSC DQM is responding to the OTMBs with GEM-CSC LCTs.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Thanks @dildick

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 23, 2021

Thanks

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 23, 2021

@rekovic Can you sign off, please?

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 29, 2021

@rekovic Can you sign, please?

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Nov 30, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Observed differences in the DQM outputs being blessed by the detector experts

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d80a1fb into cms-sw:master Nov 30, 2021
@dildick dildick deleted the from-CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-21-1100-fix-ge21-pad-producer branch November 30, 2021 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants