Restored the ShieldingME4 and fixed all the MUON overlaps in muonYoke.xml

[slomeo]

PR description:

Restored the ShieldingME4 and fixed all the MUON overlaps in muonYoke.xml
A new version of muonYoke.xml is created (i.e 2026/v2/muonYoke.xml)

@bsunanda @ianna @cvuosalo @civanch @etcherniaev : FYI

PR validation:

1. validation by "cmsShow.exe -c overlaps.fwc --sim-geom-file cmsSimGeom-2026.root"

2. validation by "nohup cmsRun SimG4Core/PrintGeomInfo/test/python/g4OverlapCheck2026_cfg.py >& overlaps.out &"
   Muon's volumes are not present in the overlaps.out file.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

nothing special

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36234/26864

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slomeo (Sergio Lo Meo) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Geometry/CMSCommonData (geometry, upgrade)
• Geometry/MuonCommonData (geometry)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ptcox, @bsunanda, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[perrotta]

please test

[srimanob]

Thanks very much @slomeo

By the way, why do you touch only
Geometry/CMSCommonData/data/dd4hep/cmsExtendedGeometry2026D86.xml
but not the definition of M10 (of D86)?
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py#L1280

[slomeo]

Hi @srimanob

but not the definition of M10 (of D86)? https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py#L1280

because if I understood well, I think that @bsunanda wants to do this job.

@bsunanda , please let me know

[bsunanda]

Please do not change Configuration/Geometry/python/dict,, and also please restore the old cmsExtendedGeometry2026D26XML_cfi.py. I am preparing the next version of scenario.

[srimanob]

OK, then I think we should do it in a cleaner way. For example,

• This PR adds only XML, and we touch all D86 XMLs in a separate PR.
• Or this PR includes all changes needed for D86

[srimanob]

Our comments cross @bsunanda
It seems we agree that this PR adds XML.
@slomeo Would you mind updating also the PR title and description to reflect the change. Thanks again.

[slomeo]

ok @srimanob, probably it is better that this PR is related only to muonYoke.xml

what do I have to do now?

[slomeo]

do I have to make a new "commit" without msExtendedGeometry2026D86.xml? I'm sorry but I don't understand because I never edited cmsExtendedGeometry2026D86XML_cfi.py as @bsunanda wrote.

[srimanob]

You can change back this file,
Geometry/CMSCommonData/data/dd4hep/cmsExtendedGeometry2026D86.xml
and commit & push again. The PR test will stop when you push the new one.
Then change the title and description of the PR.

[slomeo]

ok

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[slomeo]

@srimanob @bsunanda cmsExtendedGeometry2026D86.xml restored and PR title changed

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36234/26870

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #36234 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6e9b40/20745/summary.html
COMMIT: 0403ae7
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-23-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/36234/20745/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3247025
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3247003
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 41 files compared)
• Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1