Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-hcx327 Use of ESGetToken in the SiwWatcher codes in Validation/HcalHits #36263

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 27, 2021

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Use of ESGetToken in the SiwWatcher codes in Validation/HcalHits

PR validation:

Use test workflows in Validation/HcalHits/test

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36263/26929

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36263/26930

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Validation/HcalHits (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@abdoulline, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-557c44/20791/summary.html
COMMIT: b3e10e0
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-11-26-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/36263/20791/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3247873
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3247839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 41 files compared)
  • Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Nov 27, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9e22dda into cms-sw:master Nov 27, 2021
edm::LogVerbatim("ValidHcal") << "HcalTestAnalysis:: Initialise "
<< "HcalNumberingFromDDD";
const HcalDDDSimConstants *hcons = &es.getData(ddconsToken_);
edm::LogVerbatim("ValidHcal") << "HcalTestAnalysis:: Initialise HcalNumberingFromDDD";
numberingFromDDD = new HcalNumberingFromDDD(hcons);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just checking...
Previously the code made new numberingFromDDD and org at the begin of the job, and then numberingFromDDD was deleted in the destructor.
Now numberingFromDDD and org are newed at every beginRun, but still deleted only once.
Is this the wanted behaviour?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I shall take care of this once I get the IB with the merged PR. It is always not straight forward to take care of an old piece of code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants