New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.2.X] Enhance PixelTrack SoA DQM monitoring #36444
[12.2.X] Enhance PixelTrack SoA DQM monitoring #36444
Conversation
…lter for loose and above quality
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_2_X. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable gpu |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bb02a0/21155/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a combined backport of #36392 and #36432.
Restructuring SiPixelPhase1MonitorTrackSoA to use the pixel track quality information, number of layers and profiles of # hits, # layers and chi2 vs track eta/phi;.
SiPixelPhase1MonitorTrackSoA
(as suggested at add PixelTrack quality monitoring toSiPixelPhase1MonitorTrackSoA
#36392 (comment));PR validation:
Run
runTheMatrix.py --what gpu -l 11634.506
on alxplus-gpu
node.if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This backport is needed for eventual submission of large scale RelVals for GPU vs CPU reconstruction checks in this cycle.