New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop type specs for L1TMonitor and L1TMonitorClient #36588
Drop type specs for L1TMonitor and L1TMonitorClient #36588
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36588/27554
|
A new Pull Request was created by @NiharSaha (Nihar Ranjan Saha) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
l1TdeRCTfromRCT.HistFolder = cms.untracked.string('L1TEMU/L1TdeRCT_FromRCT') | ||
|
||
l1TdeRCTRun1 = l1TdeRCT.clone( | ||
rctSourceData = 'caloStage1Digis', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this change is not the same: l1TdeRCTRun1 should be a frs clone of l1TdeRCT and then the pvalues of l1TdeRCT should be changed, please leave as it was
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, Thanks. Updated as it was in the new commit.
l1tRctfromRCT.HistFolder = cms.untracked.string('L1T/L1TRCT_FromRCT') | ||
|
||
l1tRctRun1 = l1tRct.clone( | ||
rctSource = 'caloStage1Digis', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same as before
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36588/27558
|
Pull request #36588 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a70c32/21469/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
muonCollection2 = (emulatorModule, "imdMuonsBMTF") | ||
monitorDir = ugmtEmuImdMuDqmDir+"/BMTF/data_vs_emulator_comparison" | ||
summaryTitle = "Summary of uGMT intermediate muon from BMTF comparison between unpacked and emulated" | ||
ignoreBin = cms.untracked.vint32(ignoreBins) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this type be dropped?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it can't be dropped as it is not already defined. While I tried to remove type it was showing error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. You can define a default value in l1tdeStage2uGMT
(empty vector), so that it can be modified everywhere else; or alternatively let the type specified, as it is now (not to be preferred, though)
muonCollection2 = (emulatorModule, "imdMuonsOMTFNeg") | ||
monitorDir = (ugmtEmuImdMuDqmDir+"/OMTF_neg/data_vs_emulator_comparison") | ||
summaryTitle = ("Summary of uGMT intermediate muon from OMTF- comparison between unpacked and emulated") | ||
ignoreBin = cms.untracked.vint32(ignoreBins) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this type be dropped?
muonCollection2 = (emulatorModule, "imdMuonsOMTFPos") | ||
monitorDir = (ugmtEmuImdMuDqmDir+"/OMTF_pos/data_vs_emulator_comparison") | ||
summaryTitle = "Summary of uGMT intermediate muon from OMTF+ comparison between unpacked and emulated" | ||
ignoreBin = cms.untracked.vint32(ignoreBins) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this type be dropped?
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a70c32/21508/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36588/27624
|
Pull request #36588 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a70c32/21523/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Drop type specs in DQM/L1TMonitor, DQM/L1TMonitorClient python configuration files.
Central DQM migration campaign for drop type spces following
https://cms-sw.github.io/cms_coding_rules.html#6--packaging-rules-1
and update the safer syntax for existing parameters like: (1) drop type specifications where the original parameter exists. (2) using "clone" instead of "deepcopy" (3) move all parameters inside the clone
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos