New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PPS transport update #36589
PPS transport update #36589
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36589/27555
|
A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6314e0/21464/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 this PR is a preparation to restore PPS simulation, itself should not affect any WF. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@civanch, how did you check that the issue #36544 gets fixed with this PR? If any further change is needed in this PR (e.g. re-enabling PPS sim), could you please profit and fix the following (unrelated) issues pointed out by the static analyzer in two files already touched by this PR?
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36589/27618 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36589/27622
|
Pull request #36589 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6314e0/21521/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 concerns to initialization are addressed without modifications of python files. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
PR description:
This PR should fix #36544 - thread safety is PPS proton transport is provided,
all class members in the sub-library are now initialized to zero, LogVerbatim is used instead of LogInfo. Because PPS transport is disabled for the time being, no change in results are expected.
PR validation:
private