PPS renaming alca reco producers - backport of PR#36702 to 12_2_X

[grzanka]

PR description:

This is a backport of #36702 to 12_2_X

It is related to cms-AlCaDB/AlCaTools#53

The changes are necessary for T0 replay with PPS. The suggestions for renaming appeared in the discussion of #36273
It is following #36698

PR validation:

Tested with:

runTheMatrix.py -l 1041 --ibeos
runTheMatrix.py -l 1042 --ibeos

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @grzanka (Leszek Grzanka) for CMSSW_12_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

• CalibPPS/AlignmentGlobal (alca)
• CalibPPS/TimingCalibration (alca)
• Configuration/AlCa (alca)
• Configuration/EventContent (operations)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @fabferro, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @ebrondol, @tocheng, @lecriste, @mmusich, @slomeo, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @kpedro88 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from PPS renaming AlCa Prompt producers and PPSCalTrackBasedSel AlCa Reco to autoAlca.py #36702

[srimanob]

test parameters:

• workflows = 1041,1042

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test

[tvami]

backport of #36702

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-77c91d/21934/summary.html
COMMIT: 066c302
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2022-01-23-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/36784/21934/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @CMS-ECAL-Trigger-Group Backport to 12_2_X: ECAL TPG Parameter Builder changes for double weights #36760

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-77c91d/21934/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-77c91d/21934/git-merge-result

RelVals-INPUT

• 4.764.76_ZMuSkim2012D+ZMuSkim2012D+HLTDSKIM2+RECODR1reHLT2+HARVESTDR1reHLT/step2_ZMuSkim2012D+ZMuSkim2012D+HLTDSKIM2+RECODR1reHLT2+HARVESTDR1reHLT.log

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /pool/condor/dir_83255/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-77c91d/1041.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCAL+ALCASPLITPPSCAL+ALCAHARVDPPSCAL
• /pool/condor/dir_83255/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-77c91d/1042.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCALALIG+ALCASPLITPPSALIG+ALCAHARVDPPSALIG

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3250594
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3250572
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 41 files compared)
• Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

Backport PR. PR test runs fine, the additional workflows with the change run fine.

[tvami]

+alca

[tvami]

Hi @kskovpen you signed the original PR for this, please consider signing the backport as well, thanks!

[kskovpen]

+1

[tvami]

Hi @perrotta @qliphy this is essentially fully signed. I guess we should wait a day to see how the IB goes with the master PR and merge this. We'll also request to cut a 12_2_0 so these PPS workflows can be tested. We can discuss the details on Tuesday's ORP

[qliphy]

Hi @perrotta @qliphy this is essentially fully signed. I guess we should wait a day to see how the IB goes with the master PR and merge this. We'll also request to cut a 12_2_0 so these PPS workflows can be tested. We can discuss the details on Tuesday's ORP

@tvami This week's ORP will be cancelled due to ongoing CMSWeek. However, we can merge this PR and build next 12_2_X this week if it is really urgently needed.

[qliphy]

merge
Master PR IB test looks good

[tvami]

build next 12_2_X this week if it is really urgently needed.

Yes that would be great! But we can wait for the geometry backports before cutting a new 12_2_X release.